Since the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been arrived at, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
It's also important to note that granting of seniority to a civil servant without the actual size of service nearly violates the entire service structure being a civil servant inducted in Grade seventeen by claiming these kinds of benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher grade, which is neither the intention of the regulation nor on the equity. Read more
However, decisions rendered from the Supreme Court with the United States are binding on all federal courts, and on state courts regarding issues on the Constitution and federal law.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed to your disposal of the instant petition to the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner and also private respondents and will choose care of many of the facets of the case and guarantee that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
one hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight provided to any reported judgment could depend on the reputation of both the reporter and the judges.[seven]
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject matter: Appeal At times it really is effortless for your Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to produce website an attempt to dispose of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has achieved to your stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it's arrived at these kinds of stage. Read more
Summaries offer concise insights into the legal principles governing agreements between parties, such as the formation, interpretation, and enforceability of contracts, supplying a precious resource for understanding contractual rights and obligations.
Article 27 of your Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination with the time of appointment of service but after the appointment as well. The disparity while in the fork out scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is during the clear negation from the regulation laid down by the Supreme Court in its different pronouncements. Read more
twelve . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair to your offender as well as Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to a tradition that the reader should be capable of deduce the logic from the decision along with the statutes.[4]
Because of their position between the two main systems of regulation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as combined systems of legislation.
The Court holds the authority to review any criminal or civil cases, apart from most civil cases in which the amount in controversy does not exceed $two hundred. Additionally, it regulates the legal profession in Washington, and it's issued a Code of Judicial Conduct to guide the actions of state judges.